NASHVILLE, TN — A blind Tennessee man says he was stranded at a Nashville-area airport after a Lyft driver allegedly refused to take his guide dog, then drove away without canceling the trip. James Rath says the sequence left him unable to quickly request another car after a long day of travel.

Rath, who travels with a trained guide dog named Hobie, shared the encounter on TikTok. In the video, he says the driver saw Hobie, said, “I don’t take dogs,” and departed while the ride remained active. Rath says Lyft had already identified Hobie on his account as a service animal before the ride was accepted.

What Rath says happened at the airport pickup

According to Rath, he had already waited several minutes for a ride when the driver arrived and noticed Hobie. Rath says that instead of completing the trip, the driver declined to transport the dog and left the area. He says the most frustrating part was that the driver did not cancel the ride before driving away.

That left the trip in an active state, which Rath says prevented him from immediately booking another driver. He says the driver appeared to be waiting for him to cancel first, which would have erased the record of the refusal and shifted the responsibility away from the driver. Rath says that kind of standoff can leave disabled riders stuck when time matters most.

Why an active ride can create a bigger problem

Rath says the issue was more than a single bad pickup. In his telling, keeping the ride active while refusing the service animal created a practical barrier that kept him from moving on to the next option. For a traveler who has just landed, that delay can add stress to an already tiring day.

He says the pattern is familiar. Rath claims that some rideshare drivers do not always cancel right away when they see a service dog, and instead stall or remain in place. He says that can interfere with work trips, medical appointments, and other obligations that depend on reliable transportation. The complaint centers on the added time and uncertainty, not just the refusal itself.

Lyft’s service-animal policy leaves little room for refusal

Lyft’s U.S. policy says drivers must accommodate passengers with service animals. The company tells drivers to “Always Say Yes” and says allergies, fear of dogs, or religious and cultural objections are not valid reasons to refuse a ride carrying a service animal.

Lyft also says a driver can face permanent deactivation if the company investigates a complaint and confirms a wrongful denial. That policy is meant to protect riders who rely on trained animals for mobility and access. In Rath’s case, Lyft’s account already listed Hobie as a service animal, according to Rath, which makes the alleged refusal especially important to review.

Lyft’s response called the situation unacceptable

Lyft responded directly to Rath’s viral post and called what he described “unacceptable.” The company asked him to contact it so the incident could be investigated.

In a message Rath shared, Lyft said it had seen his Instagram post and tried to reach him there. The company asked him to send a direct message on either platform so it could make sure the driver was held accountable. Lyft has not publicly said what action, if any, it took after the complaint, and that remains unclear.

The comments reflected a bigger accessibility debate

The video quickly drew thousands of comments, with many viewers siding with Rath. Some argued that drivers should not accept rides if they are unwilling to transport service animals. One commenter wrote, “Don’t be a driver if you won’t carry service animals.”

Others raised questions about allergies, fear of dogs, and past negative experiences with animals. Lyft’s policy addresses those concerns directly and says they do not excuse a refusal. Current and former rideshare drivers also joined the discussion, with some saying they had been informed about service-animal requirements while driving for the platform.

For disabled riders, the delay can be part of the burden

Rath says the issue goes beyond one airport pickup and reflects a recurring burden for blind and disabled riders. He argues that having to plan around possible service-animal denials adds another layer of uncertainty to everyday travel.

He says those delays can be especially disruptive when someone is trying to get to work, a medical appointment, or another time-sensitive commitment. Rath’s complaint is not simply that the driver refused the ride, but that the refusal allegedly came with no cancellation, leaving him stranded longer than necessary. His experience has put Lyft’s service-animal rules back in the spotlight for many viewers.

Real, uplifting stories from across America – GCHS Eagle's Eye.